However, I ran across something this week that has me scratching my head. You all saw the picture of the Hayes-Custer stove that I acquired a few weeks ago:


Now check out this stove near Iron River, Wisconsin, near Eau Claire, that I found at this link:
https://eauclaire.craigslist.org/atq/d/antique-wood-stove/6536706027.html


The text with the ad says that this is a Marshall-Wells stove, but you can clearly see that the design is exactly the same as the Hayes-Custer. This one is equipped with the warming oven, and instead of a large blank plate to the right of the firebox, this cooktop has four additional lids, but these were usually features that buyers could opt for if they wished to spend a little more money.
So what happened here?
At the Rochelle Gridley website entitled "100 Years Ago in the Pantagraph," where I found some of my information for my last post, the following sentence appears:
"After the 1929 fire the Association of Commerce gave some aid to help the company get on its feet again, but in 1936 the Hayes Custer Company accepted a contract with a mail order company that turned out to be a very bad deal for Hayes Custer and the contract was abrogated by a court, ending the company's operations outside the bankruptcy court."
Was Marshall-Wells that mail order company?
Another guess is that once Hayes-Custer went out of business, they sold their design specs to Marshall-Wells in Duluth. But that is just a guess. (The plans for the "Qualified Range" went through several foundries like that, the last one that I know of being the Hitzer Company in Indiana.) Marshall-Wells sold woodburning cookstoves for a number of years after this one, manufacturing some really nice-looking white cabinet style models later on. However, it could also be that Hayes-Custer built cookstoves for Marshall-Wells who simply put its name on the product. Once Hayes-Custer went out of business, Marshall-Wells could have switched foundries.
Can anyone clear this up for me? I'm really curious now.
No comments:
Post a Comment